Quoting Satoshi Nakamoto

You need a blockchain pro to spice up your life
The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that’s required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve. We have to trust them with our privacy, trust them not to let identity thieves drain our accounts. Their massive overhead costs make micropayments impossible.

A generation ago, multi-user time-sharing computer systems had a similar problem. Before strong encryption, users had to rely on password protection to secure their files, placing trust in the system administrator to keep their information private. Privacy could always be overridden by the admin based on his judgment call weighing the principle of privacy against other concerns, or at the behest of his superiors. Then strong encryption became available to the masses, and trust was no longer required. Data could be secured in a way that was physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter what.

It’s time we had the same thing for money. With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless.

We can try to use words to help the situation until code gets there.

…the design supports a tremendous variety of possible transaction types that
I designed years ago. Escrow transactions, bonded contracts, third-party arbitration,
multiparty signature, etc. If Bitcoin catches on in a big way, these are things we’ll want
to explore in the future, but they all had to be designed at the beginning to make sure
they would be possible later…
I am not Dorian Nakamoto.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *